English | Français  

Home

Project Results

What is a Quality Measure?

Who is CEQM?

National Consensus

National Consensus Summary

Top 30 Quality Measures

Quality Measures Database

Priority Domains

Data Infrastructure

Measurement Implementation

Knowledge Transfer / Communication

Project Activities

Contact

Links



Staff/Partner log-in
  

Quality Measures Database

Detailed Results


Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              
Limited Use of Routine Questionnaires Overall Rank: 84
Routine utilization of questionnaires, (e.g. quality of life questionnaires) are only used in the presence of ongoing collaborative/quality improvement programs.
Changes to or the characteristics of the health status of an individual which may lead to distress, interference with daily activities, or contact with health services. This also includes symptom severity.
Additional Domain(s) : Accessibility, Quality and Safety
Rationale
Meta analysis of studies was performed. Unselected feedback did not improve the recognition of depression (RR=0.96, 95% CI=0.83 to 1.10). High-risk feedback was shown to be effective in increasing the rate of recognition of depression (RR=2.66, 95% CI=1.78 to 3.96). This intervention increased the rate of detection of depression by 27% (95% CI=14% to 40%). Nine studies investigated the effect of the feedback of questionnaire results on the rate of intervention for emotional problems – such as referral to outside agencies and the commencement of treatment for depression. All but two studies showed non-significant results. Eight studies examined the effect of routine questionnaires on the level of depression over time. No overall effect on depression was identified in seven of the eight studies. This study suggests that unrecognised depressive symptoms resolve over a twelve month period, irrespective of whether feedback was employed or not. Similarly, another study showed a lack of overall effect of GHQ feedback on subsequent GHQ scores.

Nine randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials conducted in non-specialist settings were identified. The routine feedback of the findings of these instruments had no impact on the recognition of depression or on longer term psychosocial functioning in any of the studies.
Primary Reference
Level of Evidence
I: Consistently higher quality studies specifically focused on primary mental health care.

Summarized CommentsAdd Comment
  • This measure should also reflect action and follow-up outcomes, not just the use of questionnaires.
  • Customers do get fed up with questionnaires to be filled out, especially if in a very long term support program. We are human.
  • * Routine and standardized testing is very labour intensive and requires data input, analyzing and reporting in order to be of much use - need to be sure of capacity to deliver on all areas before selecting the tool.
Variation in Results
Ratings-based Rank
Relevance 91
Actionability 56
Overall Importance 94
 
Stakeholder Rank
Academics 76
Clinicians 94
Consumers 73
Decision Makers 84
 
Special Group Rank
First Nations 78
Rural Areas 48
Federal Stakeholders 50
Regional Rank
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL YT NT NU
69 47 99 115 96 88 58 97 149 65 31 39 37
 
Overall Rank

      

84


SW06d (B1336)

 
Distribution of Survey Respondent Ratings
Relevance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 0 0.85 1.67 4.88 11.18 29.78 36.3 15.33
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Actionability
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 0.43 1.28 3.42 6.64 11.45 26.98 37.33 12.48
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Overall Importance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
5.62 49.31 45.06
3 2 1

3 = can live without
2 = nice to have
1 = indispensable
Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              

Copyright © 2006 CEQM and CARMHA • infoceqm-acmq.com

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policies of Health Canada