English | Français  

Home

Project Results

What is a Quality Measure?

Who is CEQM?

National Consensus

National Consensus Summary

Top 30 Quality Measures

Quality Measures Database

Priority Domains

Data Infrastructure

Measurement Implementation

Knowledge Transfer / Communication

Project Activities

Contact

Links



Staff/Partner log-in
  

Quality Measures Database

Detailed Results


Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              
Consumer involvement in quality improvement Overall Rank: 107
Number of self-identified consumers and family members on governing, advisory, or planning bodies involved in quality measurement / improvement activities.
Patient-centeredness refers to establishing a partnership among practitioners, patients and their families (when appropriate) to ensure that decisions respect patients’ wants, needs and preferences. This includes ensuring that patients have the education and support they need to make their own decisions and participate in their own care.
Additional Domain(s) : Acceptability, Satisfaction
Rationale

Primary Reference
Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services Addictive and Mental Disorders Division. (2001). Improving Montanas Mental Health System Final Report. The Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. Retrieved on Aug 3, 2006 from: http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/aboutus/divisions/addictivementaldisorders/services/tacfinalreport.pdf
Level of Evidence
III: Preliminary research evidence only or evidence based on consensus opinion only.

Summarized CommentsAdd Comment
  • Patient centered care is a individual issue. Finding people to work on boards without a disease specific agenda is difficult
  • This is very critical to a responsive and responsible system. All too often "lip service" is given to family and patient involvement but excuses such as "confidentiality" prevent this from happening in reality.
  • * Ideally, one would want to understand either the extent or the percent of involvement, rather than the number.
  • * The actual number of people is not as important as their roles, support for leadership roles and how their expertise is accepted and used.
  • Others comments are all true, but at least getting the numbers would be a great start! It would signal to the field the importance of client/family involvement in quality improvement work.
Variation in Results
Ratings-based Rank
Relevance 114
Actionability 108
Overall Importance 89
 
Stakeholder Rank
Academics 119
Clinicians 106
Consumers 76
Decision Makers 106
 
Special Group Rank
First Nations 67
Rural Areas 100
Federal Stakeholders 86
Regional Rank
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL YT NT NU
108 121 103 55 59 136 123 48 17 112 104 41 105
 
Overall Rank

      

107


SW05b (H887)

 
Distribution of Survey Respondent Ratings
Relevance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.71 2.26 3.51 1.83 8.62 10.7 27.58 25.79 18.99
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Actionability
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1.07 0.85 3.04 1.55 8.06 18.58 28.79 18.28 19.77
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Overall Importance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10.03 41.55 48.42
3 2 1

3 = can live without
2 = nice to have
1 = indispensable
Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              

Copyright © 2006 CEQM and CARMHA • infoceqm-acmq.com

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policies of Health Canada