English | Français  

Home

Project Results

What is a Quality Measure?

Who is CEQM?

National Consensus

National Consensus Summary

Top 30 Quality Measures

Quality Measures Database

Priority Domains

Data Infrastructure

Measurement Implementation

Knowledge Transfer / Communication

Project Activities

Contact

Links



Staff/Partner log-in
  

Quality Measures Database

Detailed Results


Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              
Sensitivity to Culture/Ethnicity Overall Rank: 85
Patient reports that staff are sensitive to their cultural/ethnic background.
Patient-centeredness refers to establishing a partnership among practitioners, patients and their families (when appropriate) to ensure that decisions respect patients’ wants, needs and preferences. This includes ensuring that patients have the education and support they need to make their own decisions and participate in their own care.
Additional Domain(s) : Acceptability
Rationale
Research studies have identified barriers to mental health care related to differences between clinicians and patients in culture, ethnicity, language, and age. Poor "cultural competency" among staff can contribute to consumer dissatisfaction, poor communication, and poor collaboration on treatment, and has been associated with early termination of treatment. There is little empirical evidence addressing the association between clinician cultural competency and clinical outcomes.
Primary Reference
Center for Quality Assessment and Improvement. Staff Sensitivity to Cultural/Ethnic Background. Retrieved July 31, 2006 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.cqaimh.org/Report.asp?Code=MHSI0008D&POP=0J
Level of Evidence
VI: Non-validated scale: Research regarding the quality of the scale has not been conducted.

Summarized CommentsAdd Comment
  • It is important that staff are sensitive to service users cultural/ethnic background, however broad cultural issues are only one factor e.g. service providers should be aware of verbal/nonverbal cues while providing care. Providers should always talk to u
  • Shouldn't gender and sexual orientation also be included in this section?
  • * This should be one of a comprehensive set of measures.
  • * I’m not sure you would get valid information.
Variation in Results
Ratings-based Rank
Relevance 76
Actionability 87
Overall Importance 79
 
Stakeholder Rank
Academics 97
Clinicians 86
Consumers 56
Decision Makers 72
 
Special Group Rank
First Nations 43
Rural Areas 35
Federal Stakeholders 70
Regional Rank
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL YT NT NU
44 68 25 37 45 129 12 37 131 82 54 11 82
 
Overall Rank

      

85


SW05h (H991)

 
Distribution of Survey Respondent Ratings
Relevance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.71 0 1.06 1.31 3.4 8.5 16.68 44.33 24
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Actionability
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1.07 0.78 2.19 2.9 8.16 14.07 27 27.86 15.97
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Overall Importance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
3.95 41.88 54.17
3 2 1

3 = can live without
2 = nice to have
1 = indispensable
Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              

Copyright © 2006 CEQM and CARMHA • infoceqm-acmq.com

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policies of Health Canada