English | Français  

Home

Project Results

What is a Quality Measure?

Who is CEQM?

National Consensus

National Consensus Summary

Top 30 Quality Measures

Quality Measures Database

Priority Domains

Data Infrastructure

Measurement Implementation

Knowledge Transfer / Communication

Project Activities

Contact

Links



Staff/Partner log-in
  

Quality Measures Database

Detailed Results


Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              
Mental Health Triage in ER Overall Rank: 65
Use of a comprehensive assessment method (e.g., Australian Mental Health Triage scale) to determine clinical urgency in the emergency department so that patients are seen in a timely manner.
A hospital room or mobile crisis response unit equipped for the reception and treatment of persons requiring immediate medical care.
Additional Domain(s) : Patients with Acute Conditions
Rationale
The emergency department provides the main services for people who self-harm. Emergency department staff should assess risk and emotional, mental and physical state quickly, and try to encourage people to stay to organize psychosocial assessment.

Mental health triage systems may improve outcomes, improve access to treatment, and reduce waiting times for people with mental health problems attending emergency departments as well as reduce the numbers who leave without treatment. The Mental Health Triage Scale was found to be acceptable to non-psychiatric triage nurses. People with mental health problems might receive better care and help in emergency departments if non-psychiatric triage nurses were trained in the assessment and initial management of people with mental health problems, and if mental health services and emergency departments were to collaborate effectively in planning and delivering services.
Primary Reference
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Self-harm. The short-term physical and psychological management and secondary prevention of self-harm in primary and secondary care. November 2004. P. 58, Section 4.4.1.3, P. 115, Section 7.5.7.2. Retrieved July 31, 2006 from: http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=cg016niceguideline
Level of Evidence
III: Preliminary research evidence only or evidence based on consensus opinion only.

Summarized CommentsAdd Comment
  • Some ER's do not triage MH patients at all! They are off the radar screen.
  • Mental illness seems to have been rarely taken seriously in triage.
  • Perhaps the mental health assessment could be offered first, rather than have the person sit for hours in emergency.
  • Emergency Departments are under different management than Primary Health Care Organizations (PHCO’S). I would suggest provincial government standards for emergency services rather than have this measure
  • Through the years triage in mental health services has amounted to some guess work with many people in actual crisis sent home still at risk. This has been and is the reality.
Variation in Results
Ratings-based Rank
Relevance 51
Actionability 74
Overall Importance 66
 
Stakeholder Rank
Academics 73
Clinicians 71
Consumers 55
Decision Makers 48
 
Special Group Rank
First Nations 95
Rural Areas 78
Federal Stakeholders 25
Regional Rank
BC AB SK MB ON QC NB NS PE NL YT NT NU
104 84 111 36 77 25 7 47 101 110 10 37 105
 
Overall Rank

      

65


SA18e (B78)

 
Distribution of Survey Respondent Ratings
Relevance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.9 1.26 0.36 0.43 2.84 3.99 17.33 46.95 25.94
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Actionability
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2.52 1.8 2.41 3.77 5.12 11.65 27.86 28.92 15.94
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Low High
Overall Importance
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2.34 33.97 63.69
3 2 1

3 = can live without
2 = nice to have
1 = indispensable
Use checkboxes to select measures to print or display              

Copyright © 2006 CEQM and CARMHA • infoceqm-acmq.com

The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policies of Health Canada